![]() ![]() I used it in addition to LrC and Ps, and as those got better there wasn't much going to warrant keeping it. Camera support issues, and other stuff caught up. I owned PL for quite a while, but got frustrated and dropped it. Very useful for when you weren't in perfect control of the shoot. Topaz Sharpening AI is a useful plugin for improving sharpness/focus but in particular it can compensate for blurred images from subject/camera movement. If I was still on PS I wouldn't be considering moving today I moved to a raw converter 10+ years ago. So my need for PS is only when I want to do extensive cloning, object removal, replace sky, compositing. By edit I mean make tonal changes to the image globally / locally add clarity, structure, have excellent masking (colour, brush, radial gradient, feather masks, copy paste and invert masks, luma masks, luma curves to change contrast without impacting colour. I find that modern raw converters like LR/ Capture One Pro/DXO can edit files without the need for PS. I shoot exclusively raw so switched to LR at V1. I was an old time PS user many moons ago. You would need a very good reason which it doesn't sound like you have What Nigel said, plus changing software is not easy. Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this. Do either of these really make a significant difference over what can be accomplished within Photoshop itself? I'm wondering what others think about supplementing PS with either DxO's PhotoLab 4 or the various Topaz apps. I'm a long time user of Photoshop and expect I will continue to be in the future. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |